Definition of Debate Text
A debate text is a presentation of the opinions of two
parties who share various reasons and arguments in different points of view or opinions
(pro-cons) to defend their respective views. As stated by Iman (2017, p. 94),
the debate is the process of presenting ideas or opinions of two opposing
parties who try to defend their ideas or opinions (Iman, 2017: 94).
Debate text is a genre derived from exposition text. Why is the debate
classified as an exposition text? Because the main thing discussed is still an
argument or opinion. The difference is that there are two conflicting opinions
in the debate text, namely the affirmative opinion (agree) and the opposition
(disagree).
Difference between Discussion and Debate
Then how is it different from a discussion in the form of
two opinions juxtaposed in one text? The discussion compares several opinions
that may be contradictory or slightly different. Then, the discussion text will
conclude the middle way that can be taken so that the opinion becomes more
valuable and effective in application.
Meanwhile, the debate pits two opinions to achieve victory
for one side. It may sound too competitive and not as positive and constructive
as a discussion. However, sometimes things have to be decided through just one
idea to be carried out more effectively.
Discussion can still be applied after the debate. In the
end, the various opinions of both the losing Team in the debate can still be
integrated into the "winning" opinion.
Debate is also a healthy way to question each other's
opinions. As stated by Handayani (2017, p. 139), debate allows students to
present their understanding of a topic, question the opinions of others, argue
with others, argue and clarify arguments, and evaluate others.
Debate Text Structure
Two structures can be noticed in the debate text. First, the
text is notes or writings from the debate itself. In this case, of course, the
debate text will have an exposition text structure. However, as a debated text
in the form of implementation, here is the structure:
1. Orientation
It is an introduction and disclosure of the
topic to be debated (motion).
2. Affirmation opinion
Affirmative parties will present their
arguments first with supporting reasons; why support the motion states.
3.
Opposition
opinion
The opposition will present a rebuttal
argument against the affirmative party's statement accompanied by reasons.
4.
Neutral
opinion
In the form of a mediating opinion between
the pro and contra who do not have a tendency to argue with either party.
5.
Final
decision (Conclusion)
It is a conclusion and assessment based on
the strengths and weaknesses of the affirmative, oppositional, and neutral
parties.
In addition, the implementation of the debate also has a
special structure that is usually followed so that it is carried out more
orderly and in accordance with the objectives. There are various debate
structures based on the geographical location of the implementation, including
British, American, Australian, and Asian debate structures. One example of a
debate structure commonly used here (Asia).
- The moderator opened the debate and invited the
first speaker of the pro group to present an argument.
- Then, in turn, the first speaker of the
opposition group is invited to present an argument.
- The moderator invited the second speaker from
the pro group to present an argument.
- Furthermore, speakers of the two opposition
groups are also welcome to present their arguments.
- The moderator invited the third speaker from the
pro group to present an argument.
- Next, the speakers of the three opposition
groups presented their arguments.
- The moderator invites the opposition group to
deliver a reply speech made by the first speaker or the second speaker.
- Followed by the pro group delivered a counter
speech with the same provisions.
- The debate ended, and the moderator closed the
debate.
Elements of Debate Text
If it is necessary to mention the elements in the text of the
debate, then based on the Ministry of Education and Culture Team (2017, p.
206), the elements of the debate are as follows.
1.
Motion
It is a matter that is debated and can be
known from the title or opinion submitted by the debating parties.
2.
Affirmation
team
Is the party that agrees to the motion or
issue being debated.
3.
Opposition
team
Is the party that opposes or disagrees with
the disputed issue (motion).
4.
Neutral
Team
Is the audience or judges who are invited
to the debate.
5.
Moderator
The party regulates the debate starting
from the time limit given for both parties to express their opinions and
ensures that questions and opinions remain on topic or motion (not out of
line).
6.
Author
(Minutes)
The note taker is the writer of the debate
whose job is to record everything that happens in the debate, including debate
motions, moderator statements, each party's arguments to the final decision.
Language Rules of Debate Text
According to the Ministry of Education and Culture Team
(2019, p. 198), the variety of language used in the debate is scientific
linguistic rules that must meet the following characteristics.
- In accordance with standard language rules, both
spelling and grammatical rules (formation of words, phrases, clauses,
sentences, and paragraphs).
- The ideas expressed must be true according to
the facts and acceptable to common sense (logical), precise, and have only one
meaning, solid, direct to the target, coherent and systematic and presented as
effective sentences.
- The word chosen has the actual meaning (denotative).
In addition, because the debate is one of the derivatives of
the exposition text, some of the linguistic rules of the exposition text also
apply, including:
- Using terminology of technical words related to
the topic of discussion.
- Many use words (conjunctions) that show an
argumentative relationship or causality. For example, cause, because, if, thus,
therefore, consequently.
- Using mental verbs (mental verbs), such as:
concerning, expected, estimating, surmising, assuming, concluding, opinionating,
and admiring.
- Rich in reference words such as: according to
opinion, based on data, referring to opinion.
- Using persuasive words, such as: expected,
should, should need, should. In addition (Kemdikbud, 2017, p.81).
Debate Text Type
It should be noted first that the debates studied in this
lesson are scientific debates, which use valid arguments based on data and
science. Not the coachman debate that, unfortunately, we often find in everyday
life or TV shows.
The coachman debate has no clear purpose and substance. Its
nature will only try to defeat the opinion of the other party regardless of the
validity of the argument. His opinion is only a personal opinion and plays
logic that is not necessarily true as a weapon.
Debates can be classified into two broad categories: applied
debates and academic debates. Applied debates are carried out on propositions,
questions, and topics specifically determined by the jury and delivered before
or during the debate.
Academic debates are conducted based on propositions in
which the jury has an academic interest. Debates are usually presented before a
teacher or audience without direct power to decide about the proposition
(Freeley & David, 2009: 19).
In addition, debate can also be divided into three
categories (Tarigan, 2008, pp. 95-100) when viewed from the form, purpose, and
method, namely:
1.
Assembly
Debate or Parliamentary Debate
It aims to provide and increase support for
the enactment of the law. In this debate, all members who wish to express their
views or arguments, both for and against, are given the opportunity based on
the permission of the assembly.
2.
The
debate of Re-examination (Evaluation) to Know the Truth of the Previous
Examination
It was started by the affirmative party,
who delivered the official speech and was then scrutinized for seven minutes by
the first opposition speaker. The affirmative party was then given four minutes
to clarify the evidence and arguments. Next, the second opposition speaker
expressed a contra opinion and then re-examined by the second affirmation party
and so on.
3.
Formal,
Conventional, or Educational Debate
This debate allows the affirmation team and
the opposition team to present their arguments to the listeners in the same
time frame. Each speaker describes a sub-topic related to the Team's argument
with evidence.
Debate Text Example
An example of a complete debate text is in the form of a
moderator text and a series of debate implementations and their elements.
According to the Ministry of Education and Culture Team (2017, p. 179), the
following is an example of a debated text.
Absorption of Foreign Language
Vocabulary Evidence of Indonesian Language Inability in Interaction with Other
Languages
Debate Moderator Text
Good afternoon; this afternoon, we will take part in a
debate between the Affirmation Team from SMA Pembangunan Jaya, the Opposition
Team from SMK Nusantara, and the Neutral Team from MA Al-Ikhlas.
This morning the two teams will debate about "The
Absorption of Foreign Language Vocabulary Evidence of Indonesian Inability to
Interact with Other Languages."
Before carrying out the debate, I will read the rules for
the debate as follows.
- These Rules apply to each participant during the
match round.
- Participants wear full uniforms during the
debate activities.
- The motion is announced thirty minutes (30
minutes) before the debate takes place to prepare arguments.
- During the thirty minutes (30 minutes) of
preparation time, participants are not allowed to access the internet or use
electronic devices and are only allowed to use printed materials such as books,
newspapers, magazines, journals, personal notes, etc.
- Participants are not allowed to bring printed
materials during the match. Participants are only allowed to bring personal
notes during the match.
- Each participant is prohibited from bringing
and/or using cigarettes, narcotics, liquor, sharp weapons or firearms during
the Debate Contest.
- Each participant is prohibited from
communicating with the teacher or the audience during the match.
- Each participant is prohibited from using
electronic devices such as laptops, mobile phones, cameras during the match.
- Each participant is prohibited from personally
attacking other participants during the debate.
- Each
participant is prohibited from using abusive language, indecent and/or
offensive to SARA.
Next, I gave the spokesperson for each Team an opportunity
to introduce themselves.
Affirmation Team: (introduce self)
Opposition Team : (introduce self)
Neutral Team: (introduce self)
Motion (Read by Moderator)
Today Indonesian continues to grow and is recognized as an
international language. However, in its development, it is proven that the
Indonesian language absorbs a lot of foreign vocabulary. To develop, Indonesian
is highly dependent on foreign languages. There are those who think that
foreign language vocabulary is included in the use of Indonesian because of the
powerlessness of Indonesian in the interaction between languages.
This assumption is what we will discuss in this debate. I
invite the Affirmation Team, the Opposition Team, and the Neutral Team to share
their opinions for the first round.
Affirmation Team:
I agree that foreign language vocabulary is included in the
use of Indonesian because of the powerlessness of Indonesian in the interaction
between languages. Indonesian cannot be separated from other languages, both
regional and foreign languages. The role of foreign languages in Indonesian
proves that there is a contact or relationship between languages so that foreign
languages are absorbed into Indonesian. Indonesian relies on foreign
vocabulary, which is then standardized into Indonesian. This proves that
Indonesian is dependent on foreign languages and proof that Indonesian is
difficult to communicate without the help of foreign vocabulary.
With the inclusion of foreign language vocabularies into
Indonesian, more and more people are able to communicate well so that the
knowledge transfer process runs quickly. Evidence that Indonesian is powerless
to interact between languages can be seen in the use of the word vitamin,
which is absorbed from foreign language vocabulary, which, if explained in
Indonesian, is not necessarily understood by language actors. However, the
absorption of vocabulary from a foreign language makes it easier for us to
pronounce understand, as well as makes the interaction between languages
easier. Without the help of foreign languages that enter Indonesian,
Indonesian has not been able to show its existence in inter-language interactions.
Many vocabularies are taken from foreign languages, so the
role of Indonesian is still in doubt. Many people are more familiar with
borrowed vocabulary from foreign languages than Indonesian. Therefore, I
still agree that foreign language vocabulary entered into Indonesian proves the
powerlessness of Indonesian in the interaction between languages.
Opposition Team:
I don't agree that foreign language vocabulary included in
Indonesian use occurs because of the powerlessness of the Indonesian language
in inter-language interactions. Foreign language vocabulary into Indonesian is
only used as synonyms that are easier to understand for some people. However,
in essence, in Indonesian itself, there are already vocabularies related to
these foreign vocabularies. For example, we hear the word snack more often in
the community. In Indonesian, snack means light food. Thus, the entry of
foreign vocabulary is only a variation of words for some people.
Indonesian is able to interact between languages because
it has many variations of the vocabulary. Foreign language vocabulary is only
used and understood by certain circles. However, Indonesian is understood and
used in almost all circles. That means, even though many foreign language
vocabularies are entered into Indonesian, the existence of Indonesian is higher
than foreign language vocabularies that have been standardized or have not been
standardized into Indonesian.
Indonesian is able to interact with other languages
without the help of foreign language vocabulary, and the entry of foreign
language vocabulary is not caused by the powerlessness of Indonesian in the
interaction between languages. However, this happens because people want to
feel highly educated and honored when using foreign language vocabulary. Thus,
I still don't agree if the foreign language vocabulary that is included in the
use of a foreign language shows the powerlessness of the Indonesian language in
the interaction between languages.
Neutral Team
As a neutral party, I believe that Indonesian's ability in
inter-language interactions can be realized if the portion of the use of
Indonesian is balanced with the vocabulary of foreign languages. Suppose
someone uses a foreign language that has been standardized, such as the words
atom, vitamin, unit. Of course, this is not a problem because foreign languages
have become equivalents to Indonesian. However, if Indonesian users use a
foreign language that has not been standardized, this becomes a threat to our
beloved language. The use of foreign vocabulary in Indonesian is not always
identified with a negative impact because there are positive things. Namely, it
can facilitate communication activities,
However, it is hoped that Indonesian equivalents will be
intensive socialization so that vocabulary identity in Indonesian is not eroded
by vocabulary from foreign languages. In the future, it is hoped that there
will be no more discourse that foreign language vocabulary is more familiar to
Indonesian language users than the Indonesian language itself.